Imagine a hiring assistant that drafts interview questions for a recruiter. Use this illustrative case to separate the intended use, risks, supporting evidence, and the pilot decision.
Reviewed requirements, gaps, and a recorded decision
Try this with the assistant
Add the relevant saved records to your chat, then adapt this request to your work.
Help me prepare an Assessment for a hiring assistant that drafts interview questions. Start by asking about the intended users, affected people, boundaries, owner, and product version. Identify assumptions and propose risks, controls, and evidence requirements for my review.
Bound the question
State who drafts the questions, who reviews them, and which hiring decisions remain with a person. Record that context in Intent before choosing tests.
Make the risks inspectable
Describe concerns such as inappropriate questions, unequal treatment, or reliance on inaccurate outputs. For each relevant concern, document the intended control and what evidence would establish its operation.
Review the case before deciding
Use Testing & Evidence to review actual results and submissions against the requirements. Keep unresolved work visible. Record approval, conditions, or rejection for the stated pilot, with owners and follow-up triggers.
Continue after the pilot begins
Use Confidence to record observations and condition fulfillment. A product configuration change belongs to a follow-on Assessment rather than a rewrite of the earlier decision.
